2005 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Epica. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Epica.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (320 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2011 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki XL7 | 2011 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Suzuki | Chevrolet |
Model | XL7 | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 17.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |