2005 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2012 Land Rover LR4
To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR4 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover LR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover LR4 (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR4 should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover LR4 weights approximately 868 kg more than 2005 Suzuki XL7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover LR4 (508 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2012 Land Rover LR4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki XL7 | 2012 Land Rover LR4 | |
Make | Suzuki | Land Rover |
Model | XL7 | LR4 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 508 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 2548 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1915 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1882 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2885 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 86 L |