2005 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (167 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 332 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 3. (228 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki XL7 | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Suzuki | Mazda |
Model | XL7 | 3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 228 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1303 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |