2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1970 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1970 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1970 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1213 kg more than 1970 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota 4Runner | 1970 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Toyota | ZAZ |
| Model | 4Runner | 966 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4671 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1953 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2170 mm |
