2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1978 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1978 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1978 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 753 kg more than 1978 Datsun 260Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 1978 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Toyota | Datsun |
Model | 4Runner | 260Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1953 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2581 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |