2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 344 kg more than 1996 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | 4Runner | CR-V |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 434 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.8 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1844 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |