2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2008 Volvo S40
To start off, 2008 Volvo S40 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2008 Volvo S40. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 598 kg more than 2008 Volvo S40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo S40. (191 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2008 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | 4Runner | S40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 1798 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 191 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1953 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |