2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 270 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 197 kg more than 2010 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
Model | 4Runner | CTS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 302 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1953 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 68 L |