2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 327 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Traverse. (360 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Traverse.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
Model | 4Runner | Traverse |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 360 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1846 kg | 2173 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5207 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1991 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3020 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 83 L |