2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Citroen C8
To start off, 2010 Citroen C8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C8. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 201 kg more than 2010 Citroen C8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C8. (190 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Citroen C8 | |
| Make | Toyota | Citroen |
| Model | 4Runner | C8 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1846 kg | 1645 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 80 L |
