2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2010 GMC Sierra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Sierra (364 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Sierra weights approximately 804 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Sierra (506 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 2010 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Toyota | GMC |
Model | 4Runner | Sierra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 364 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 506 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1855 kg | 2659 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 129 L |