2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2011 Aston Martin DBS
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2011 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Aston Martin DBS (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 151 kg more than 2011 Aston Martin DBS.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Aston Martin DBS (569 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 2011 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2011 Aston Martin DBS | |
| Make | Toyota | Aston Martin |
| Model | 4Runner | DBS |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1846 kg | 1695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4722 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2741 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 78 L |
