2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2011 Honda Fit
To start off, 2011 Honda Fit is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2011 Honda Fit. (117 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 810 kg more than 2011 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2011 Honda Fit | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | 4Runner | Fit |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 144 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1953 kg | 1143 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1524 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2499 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 40 L |