2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Aston Martin DB9
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Aston Martin DB9 (470 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 11 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Aston Martin DB9 (600 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (434 Nm). This means 2012 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Aston Martin DB9 | |
Make | Toyota | Aston Martin |
Model | 4Runner | DB9 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 470 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 600 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1844 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4709 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1875 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2746 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 80 L |