2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Ford F-150
To start off, 2012 Ford F-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-150 (411 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford F-150 weights approximately 776 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-150 (588 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (434 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | 4Runner | F-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 411 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 588 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1953 kg | 2729 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5603 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2192 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1994 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3386 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 98 L |