2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2012 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2012 Ford Transit Connect. (136 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Transit Connect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 409 kg more than 2012 Ford Transit Connect. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Transit Connect. (173 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Transit Connect.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | 4Runner | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 173 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1953 kg | 1544 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 58 L |