2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XJ (470 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 117 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XJ (574 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (434 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Toyota | Jaguar |
Model | 4Runner | XJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 470 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 574 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1844 kg | 1961 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 82 L |