2005 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2013 Honda Accord
To start off, 2013 Honda Accord is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Accord (274 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 243 kg more than 2013 Honda Accord.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Accord. (342 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota 4Runner | 2013 Honda Accord | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | 4Runner | Accord |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 3471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 274 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 342 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 93 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1846 kg | 1603 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1436 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2725 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 65 L |