2005 Toyota Aygo vs. 1964 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2005 Toyota Aygo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Aygo weights approximately 25 kg more than 1964 TVR Griffith.
Because 1964 TVR Griffith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 TVR Griffith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Aygo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota Aygo | 1964 TVR Griffith | |
| Make | Toyota | TVR |
| Model | Aygo | Griffith |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 4725 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3405 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1615 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 67 L |
