2005 Toyota Camry vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-250 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Camry. (225 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-250 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2005 Toyota Camry. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-250 (339 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Camry. (325 Nm). This means 2010 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Camry | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Camry | E-250 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |