2005 Toyota Camry vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (225 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Camry (325 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Camry | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Camry | E-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 57 L |