2005 Toyota Highlander vs. 1972 AC 428
To start off, 2005 Toyota Highlander is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AC 428 (298 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Highlander. (230 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Highlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 351 kg more than 1972 AC 428.
Because 2005 Toyota Highlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AC 428. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AC 428 (639 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Highlander. (343 Nm). This means 1972 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Highlander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Highlander | 1972 AC 428 | |
Make | Toyota | AC |
Model | Highlander | 428 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3309 cc | 7003 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 639 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1434 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2450 mm |