2005 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 3,389 cc, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (194 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2002 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 152 kg more than 2002 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (431 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Land Cruiser | CR-V |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3389 cc | 2359 cc |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 431 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1478 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 58 L |