2005 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2011 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Bravo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (232 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2011 Fiat Bravo. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2011 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 900 kg more than 2011 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (434 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Fiat Bravo. (290 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Fiat Bravo. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser has automatic transmission and 2011 Fiat Bravo has manual transmission. 2011 Fiat Bravo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2011 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Toyota | Fiat |
Model | Land Cruiser | Bravo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4664 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 16.5:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2335 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.7 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 96 L | 57 L |