2005 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,389 cc, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (194 HP) has 115 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (431 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser has automatic transmission and 2012 Nissan Micra has manual transmission. 2012 Nissan Micra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Land Cruiser | Micra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3389 cc | 1200 cc |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 431 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 46 L |