2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 2,461 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo 850 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo 850 weights approximately 232 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volvo 850 (290 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (170 Nm). This means 1996 Volvo 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Matrix | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Matrix | 850 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1457 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2670 mm |