2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (123 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 266 kg more than 1998 Acura EL.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Acura EL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Matrix (161 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura EL. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Matrix | 1998 Acura EL | |
Make | Toyota | Acura |
Model | Matrix | EL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2619 mm |