2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 226 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (170 Nm). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota Matrix | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Matrix | S60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.1 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 93.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |
