2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2011 Citroen C3
To start off, 2011 Citroen C3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (123 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 219 kg more than 2011 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Matrix (161 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen C3. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Matrix | 2011 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Toyota | Citroen |
Model | Matrix | C3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 133 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1126 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |