2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado (298 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (123 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 682 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Chevrolet Silverado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado (414 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (161 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Matrix | 2013 Chevrolet Silverado | |
Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
Model | Matrix | Silverado |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 414 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2027 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5222 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1875 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.1 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 98 L |