2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2013 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 200 (279 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 weights approximately 502 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chrysler 200 (353 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (167 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2013 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix. 2013 Chrysler 200 has automatic transmission and 2005 Toyota Matrix has manual transmission. 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chrysler 200 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Matrix | 2013 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Toyota | Chrysler |
Model | Matrix | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 279 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.5 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2765 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.8 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |