2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Matrix would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1325 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 559 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (161 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota Matrix | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Toyota | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Matrix | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 161 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 6092 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |
