2005 Toyota Opa vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Toyota Opa is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Opa is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Opa weights approximately 320 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota Opa | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Toyota | Nissan |
| Model | Opa | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |
