2005 Toyota Opa vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Opa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Opa would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Opa is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 251 kg more than 2005 Toyota Opa.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota Opa | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Opa | C30 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1448 mm |
