2005 Toyota Opa vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Opa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Opa would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-V weights approximately 300 kg more than 2005 Toyota Opa.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Opa | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Opa | CR-V |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 184 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1645 mm |