2005 Toyota Opa vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Opa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Opa would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 680 kg more than 2005 Toyota Opa.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Opa | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Toyota | Jaguar |
Model | Opa | XJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1456 mm |