2005 Toyota RAV4 vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota RAV4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota RAV4 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota RAV4 (161 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2006 Acura CSX. (155 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura CSX weights approximately 29 kg more than 2005 Toyota RAV4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota RAV4 (224 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura CSX. (188 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota RAV4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota RAV4 | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Toyota | Acura |
Model | RAV4 | CSX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1314 kg | 1343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |