2005 Toyota RunX vs. 1972 Volvo 1800
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 1800 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota RunX (187 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 1800. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 1800 weights approximately 12 kg more than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Because 1972 Volvo 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota RunX (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 1800. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota RunX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 1800.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota RunX | 1972 Volvo 1800 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | RunX | 1800 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1178 kg | 1190 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2460 mm |