2005 Toyota RunX vs. 1979 Volvo 260

To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2005 Toyota RunX. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota RunX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Volvo 260 weights approximately 228 kg more than 2005 Toyota RunX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1979 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 260 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (147 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.

Compare all specifications: