2005 Toyota Sequoia vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 607 kg more than 2008 Volvo C70.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Sequoia (441 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo C70. (330 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota Sequoia | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Sequoia | C70 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4671 cc | 2319 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 1661 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 99 L | 68 L |
