2005 Toyota Sequoia vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Sequoia (282 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (265 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 418 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Sequoia (441 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (339 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Sequoia | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Sequoia | E-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 339 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 99 L | 72 L |