2005 Toyota Tundra vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 137 kg more than 2013 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Tundra (382 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Tundra | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Tundra | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 12.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1891 kg | 1754 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5550 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1621 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 53 L |