2005 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 731 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Volkswagen Caddy | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Volkswagen | ZAZ |
| Model | Caddy | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.6 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2330 mm |
