2005 Volkswagen Golf vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Golf. (115 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Golf. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 303 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Golf. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Golf. (165 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Golf.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Volkswagen Golf | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Volkswagen | Cadillac |
Model | Golf | BLS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 2792 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1257 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |