2005 Volkswagen Polo vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (118 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Volkswagen Polo | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | Polo | 140 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1423 cc | 2127 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |
