2005 Volkswagen Polo vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (128 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 96 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Volkswagen Polo | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Volkswagen | Ford |
Model | Polo | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 99 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 68.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1314 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3030 mm |