2005 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (112 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Volkswagen Polo | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Volkswagen | Holden |
Model | Polo | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 112 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |