2005 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,423 cc, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Jazz weights approximately 103 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (118 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 2005 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Volkswagen Polo | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Honda |
| Model | Polo | Jazz |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1423 cc | 1245 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 77 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Top Speed | 171 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1048 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 42 L |
