2005 Volvo S80 vs. 2010 BMW X3
To start off, 2010 BMW X3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo S80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo S80 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S80 (268 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2010 BMW X3. (260 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X3 weights approximately 203 kg more than 2005 Volvo S80.
Because 2010 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volvo S80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S80 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW X3. (305 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Volvo S80 | 2010 BMW X3 | |
Make | Volvo | BMW |
Model | S80 | X3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2917 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1617 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4569 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1676 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2797 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 67 L |