2005 Volvo XC90 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Volvo XC90. (208 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 625 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Volvo XC90 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Volvo | Ford |
Model | XC90 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2580 mm |